Ever since independence in the late nineteenth century, the northern and southern states differed from each other in their attitude to the Federal Union which had brought them together. Broadly speaking, the southern states wanted freedom from interference by the Federal Government. The northern states wanted a strong central government. Although slavery was the central issue which separated the two sides, there were many others differences as well. These include;
1.Economic difference, The North had 8 per cent of the
industries of the United States. It was dominated by manufacturing and trading
interest. The industries of New England and New York ere rapidly expanding in
the early nineteenth century.
Accordingly,
they needed all the labour they could get. This is why they opposed the
settlement of the West, since it drew off potential workers from their
factories. Shortage of labour meant higher wages. They wanted the people who
bought their manufactures to be concentrated in the north-east near their
factories. The West drew away customers.
The South,
by contrast, was overwhelming agricultural. In particular, ‘King Catton’ ruled
in the south, together with tobacco. Cotton was grown on large plantations in
the warm, humid lands of the and Georgia. The plantation owners were all in
favour of expanding westwards, to enable new plantation to be developed on the
fertile soils of the Mississippi valley. The labour problem did not bother
them, since they had their own slaves. High wages were not a problem.
The
manufactures of the North wanted the Federal Government to set high tariffs on
imported manufactured goods. In order to protect their industries and prevent
cheaper foreign imports undercutting their free prices. The plantation owner of
the South wanted free trade. High tariffs on imports would only encourage
foreign countries to put high tariffs on American exports- and the cotton
growers thrived on exports.
High
tariffs also put prices up to home, since foreign goods were dearer. The southerner
wanted to keep prices as low s possible. The plantation slave-owner had no
wages to pay buut he had to feed and clothe and house his slaves. The northern manufacturer,
on the other hand, obviously wanted to keep prices high.;
When high
tariffs were imposed in 1816 and even higher in 1828, there was much opposition
in the South. This came to a head in 1833 when South Carolina refused to accept
the tariff and ordered its people not to pay. President Andrew Jackson right to
collect the tariff by force if need be. South states for its policy of
Nullification as it was called and eventually agreed to compromise.
2. Social Differences, The North was free, the South was
not. The slave trade had been abolished in 1807 but population grow caused
members to grow rapidly. By the time of the Civil War, almost all the slave had
been born into captivity. In 1807 there were just over a million slaves. By 1860
there were four million.
3.Political differences, Southerners were always fearful that
free soil state of the north (where slavery was illegal) would eventually outvote
the slave-owning state of the South. When that happened they would be able to
amend the American constitution and abolish slavery. Resentment at the other
ways in which the northern states tried to keep their interest paramount aggravated
the situation.
This was
why southern politicians fought hard to preserve the individual rights of the separate
state against the Federal Government. They fought tooth and nail to ensure that
as many new slave state were admitted to the Union as free soil states. Each states, however small, could send two senators
to congress, but only when third of the senators voted in favour, could the
constitution be amended.
No comments: